Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42292909›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

CA1 Engram Cell Dynamics Before and After Learning.

Amy Monasterio, Caitlin Lienkaemper, Siria Coello, Ryan Senne, Gabriel K Ocker, Benjamin B Scott, Steve Ramirez

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amy MonasterioGraduate Program for Neuroscience, Boston University.
Caitlin LienkaemperCenter for Systems Neuroscience, Boston University.
Siria CoelloDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University.
Ryan SenneGraduate Program for Neuroscience, Boston University.
Gabriel K OckerCenter for Systems Neuroscience, Boston University.ORCID 0000-0001-9627-9576
Benjamin B ScottCenter for Systems Neuroscience, Boston University.ORCID 0000-0002-2741-7215
Steve RamirezCenter for Systems Neuroscience, Boston University.

Funding

Artificially modulating memories to alleviate psychiatric disease-like statesDP5OD023106 · OD · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI RAMIREZ, STEVE · 2016 to 2021
$2.5M
NIH HHS DP5 OD023106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fundamental question in neuroscience is how memory formation shapes brain activity at the level of neuronal populations. Recent studies of hippocampal 'engram' cells-neurons identified by learning-induced immediate early gene (IEG) expression-propose that these populations form the cellular substrate for memory. Previous experimental work suggests that cells are recruited into engrams via elevated intrinsic excitability and that learning drives coactivity among these cells to support retrieval. Despite this, an understanding of how engram dynamics evolve across learning and recall remains incomplete. Here, we combined activity-dependent genetic tagging with longitudinal two-photon calcium imaging to track CA1 engram population dynamics before and after fear conditioning. Our results reveal that engram activity is modulated by intrinsic dynamics, behavioral state, and stimulus-cued reactivation. Consistent with the idea that intrinsic dynamics bias engram allocation, spontaneous activity during rest predicted future engram membership-up to two days prior to

Indexed as

engramHippocampusimmediate-early genelearningmemoryspontaneous activity

Identifiers

PMID42292909
PMCPMC13261794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.