ArticleSAGE open medical case reports2026
Case report: Subcutaneous emphysema following postoperative nausea.
Article in SAGE open medical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subcutaneous emphysema is a rare but potentially serious complication in dentistry and oral surgery resulting from the introduction of air into soft tissues. Although commonly associated with forward venting air-driven handpieces, cases have also been reported in the absence of an identifiable air source. We report an 18-year-old female who developed extensive subcutaneous emphysema following routine extraction of four third molars performed without the use of forward venting air-driven instruments, after multiple episodes of postoperative retching and emesis. She presented with progressive facial swelling and was transferred to a tertiary care center. Imaging demonstrated widespread air tracking within the masticator and submandibular spaces without abscess. The patient was managed conservatively with intravenous antibiotics, sinus precautions, and supportive care, with gradual resolution. Although uncommon, subcutaneous emphysema warrants vigilance due to risks of mediastinal spread and airway compromise. This case highlights that postoperative nausea and emesis may introduce air into unhealed extraction sites and emphasizes the importance of early recognition and prompt management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.