Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42292867›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2026

A construction of statistical inferences in geographically weighted univariate log-gamma regression.

Dyah Setyo Rini, Purhadi, Shofi Andari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dyah Setyo RiniDepartment of Statistics, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia.
PurhadiDepartment of Statistics, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Shofi AndariDepartment of Statistics, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Log-gamma regression (LGR) is a non-linear regression model in which the response variable follows a log-gamma distribution. Previous studies have generally applied the two-parameter log-gamma distribution, consisting of shape and scale. This study extends the model by introducing an additional location parameter, forming a three-parameter log-gamma distribution. Since spatial heterogeneity often reduces the accuracy of conventional LGR, we propose the geographically weighted univariate log-gamma regression (GWULGR) to better account for spatial variation in the data. The objective of this study is to develop the GWULGR model, provide a statistical framework for its estimation and testing, and demonstrate its effectiveness through an application to regional life expectancy. The empirical results show that GWULGR provides a substantially better fit than the conventional LGR model, as reflected by a smaller corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AICc) value (162.4875 compared to 209.8250). These findings emphasize the importance of integrating spatial effects into log-gamma regression to capture local variation more accurately. Our approach involves:•Extending log-gamma regression into a three-parameter form.•Incorporating spatial effects using a geographically weighted regression (GWR) framework.•Evaluating model performance through an application to the 2023 life expectancy index across districts and cities in Sumatra.

Indexed as

BHHH algorithmGWULGRLog-gamma distributionMLEMLRT

Identifiers

PMID42292867
PMCPMC13253080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.