ArticleMethodsX2026
A construction of statistical inferences in geographically weighted univariate log-gamma regression.
Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Log-gamma regression (LGR) is a non-linear regression model in which the response variable follows a log-gamma distribution. Previous studies have generally applied the two-parameter log-gamma distribution, consisting of shape and scale. This study extends the model by introducing an additional location parameter, forming a three-parameter log-gamma distribution. Since spatial heterogeneity often reduces the accuracy of conventional LGR, we propose the geographically weighted univariate log-gamma regression (GWULGR) to better account for spatial variation in the data. The objective of this study is to develop the GWULGR model, provide a statistical framework for its estimation and testing, and demonstrate its effectiveness through an application to regional life expectancy. The empirical results show that GWULGR provides a substantially better fit than the conventional LGR model, as reflected by a smaller corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AICc) value (162.4875 compared to 209.8250). These findings emphasize the importance of integrating spatial effects into log-gamma regression to capture local variation more accurately. Our approach involves:•Extending log-gamma regression into a three-parameter form.•Incorporating spatial effects using a geographically weighted regression (GWR) framework.•Evaluating model performance through an application to the 2023 life expectancy index across districts and cities in Sumatra.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.