ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Severe anaphylactic shock reaction upon rituximab rechallenge in membranous nephropathy: a case report and literature review.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is an established treatment for primary membranous nephropathy (PMN). While generally well-tolerated, its recognized adverse effects include infusion-related reactions and immediate hypersensitivity. Particularly severe manifestations occurring >24 h post-infusion remain rarely reported. Case Presentation: A 52-year-old male with a 7-year history of biopsy-proven PMN achieved complete remission after two uneventful courses of rituximab (1 g each) in 2018. He presented in August 2025 with nephrotic syndrome relapse. A third 1 g rituximab infusion was administered without immediate complications. Approximately 24 h post-infusion, he developed generalized urticaria, fever (38 °C), dysphagia, and arthralgia, progressing to hypotension (95/55 mmHg). Examination revealed diffuse, evanescent wheals. Laboratory findings showed elevated C-reactive protein, eosinophilia, and immunoglobulin E. Esophageal CT indicated localized wall edema, while infection was excluded. A diagnosis of severe hypersensitivity reaction (anaphylactic shock, acute urticaria, and angioedema) was made, consistent with Brown grade IV severity. He responded rapidly to intravenous methylprednisolone, antihistamines, and supportive care. Conclusion: This report highlights the potential for life-threatening hypersensitivity upon rituximab re-challenge, even with a remote history of uneventful use. It emphasizes the need for prolonged post-infusion observation, patient education regarding delayed symptoms, and preparedness for immediate management of severe allergic phenomena. Further studies are warranted to elucidate risk factors and mechanisms underlying these rare but serious events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.