ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2026
Machine learning-based model for prediction of carbamazepine- and allopurinol-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions in Vietnamese.
Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The low positive predictive value of HLA-B∗15:02 and HLA-B∗58:01 for risk stratification of carbamazepine (CBZ) and allopurinol (ALLO) induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) suggests that we need a better model to prevent cases. Objective: This study aims to comprehensively investigate the role of genomic factors in CBZ- and ALLO-induced SCARs using machine-learning. Methods: A total of 249 patients with SCARs and non-affected controls were genotyped using whole exome sequencing (WES), including 75 cases and 73 controls for ALLO, and 48 cases and 53 controls for CBZ, respectively. We then applied 8 risk prediction machine learning models. Results: For predicting ALLO-induced SCARs, the Random Forest and Extra Tree models demonstrated exceptional performance among the 8 prediction models, achieving an average accuracy of 99.67% across 10 independent tests. For CBZ-induced SCARs, the Linear SVC model performed best with an average AUC of 86% on the test dataset over the 10 independent tests. Conclusion: These findings are crucial for understanding the underlying mechanisms in SCARs and for developing an accurate model which will identify patients at high risk of CBZ and ALLO-induced SCARs. Clinical implications: Patients who need a high-risk medication and who are also at high risk of SCARs, due to their inheritance of HLA-B∗15:02 and/or HLA-B∗58:01, can be further assessed using our model which enables better prediction of the risk of developing SCAR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.