ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2026
Aerosol-Generating Potential of Topical Nasal Preparation Before Nasoendoscopy: A Quantitative Study.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The aerosol-generating capacity of nasal sprays is an important but controversial topic, with mixed evidence in the literature. This study aims to quantitatively analyze the amount of aerosol generated by the use of topical nasal sprays prior to nasoendoscopy. Methods: A cohort study was conducted in a simulated outpatient ambulatory clinic. Healthy volunteers were recruited and underwent nasal spraying with normal saline containing 0.1% w/v fluorescein, using a commercially available spray system (Co-Phenylcaine Forte; ENT Technologies Pty Ltd., Victoria, Australia), within an enclosed cabin. Cabin air was sampled with a filter that trapped fluorescein, which was extracted and quantified with a fluorescence spectrometer. This was compared to background noise, represented by fluorescence quantified in cabin air sampled before nasal spraying. Statistical analysis was performed with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Multi-variable analysis was performed with a quantile regression model. Results: A total of 30 healthy volunteers were recruited. The median (IQR) concentration of fluorescein quantified with NSF spray using the standard nozzle was 20.9 (8.3-53.5) ng/mL, which was significantly higher than background noise [1.7 (1.0-2.2) ng/mL; median difference 18.9, 95% CI (10.8, 36.7), Conclusion: Preparing the nose with topical sprays could be associated with aerosol generation. Clinicians and stakeholders will need to weigh the risks and benefits of using pre-endoscopic nasal preparation sprays and institute mitigation measures as necessary. Level of Evidence: 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.