Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42292739›Full record

ArticleAnimal biotelemetry2026

Methods for tagging whale sharks: insights into performance and best practices with a focus on clamp attachments.

Freya C Womersley, Sofia Green, Alberto Garcia-Baciero, Ronan Conlon, Amy L Jeffries, Matt J Waller, Sara S Ratão, Nuno Queiroz, Pedro Afonso, Gonzalo Araujo and 51 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal biotelemetry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

61 authors.

Freya C WomersleyMarine Biological Association, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB UK.
Sofia GreenGalapagos Whale Shark Project, Puerto Ayora, Galapagos Islands Ecuador.
Alberto Garcia-BacieroWhale Shark Mexico-Conexiones Terramar, Independencia 106, 23000 La Paz, BCS Mexico.
Ronan ConlonMarine Biological Association, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB UK.
Amy L JeffriesMarine Biological Association, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB UK.
Matt J WallerMarine Biological Association, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB UK.
Sara S RatãoMarine Biological Association, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB UK.
Nuno QueirozCIBIO, Centro de Investigação Em Biodiversidade E Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Universidade Do Porto, Campus de Vairão, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal.
Pedro AfonsoInstitute of Marine Research - IMAR, Department of Oceanography and Fisheries, University of the Azores, 9900-140 Horta, Portugal.
Gonzalo AraujoMarine Research and Conservation Foundation, Lydeard St Lawrence, Somerset, TA4 3SJ UK.
Adam BarnettBiopixel Oceans Foundation, Cairns, Australia.
Christine BarryCentre for Sustainable Aquatic Ecosystems, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA Australia.
Michael L BerumenMarine Science Program, Division of Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Farukhkha BlochPan India Whale Shark Conservation Project, Wildlife Trust of India, F-13, Sector 8, Noida, NCR 201301 India.
Ginevra BoldrocchiUniversity of Insubria, Varese, VA Italy.
Camrin D BraunBiology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA.
Ryan CaillouetNational Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Pascagoula, USA.
Constance ChapmanEnvironmental Science Program, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Jesse E M CochranMarine Science Program, Division of Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Rafael de la ParraCh'ooj Ajuail AC, Xel-Ha 28, 77509 Cancún, Quintana Roo Mexico.
Stella DiamantMadagascar Whale Shark Project, Nosy Be, Madagascar.
Alistair D M DoveMuseum of Science and History, Jacksonville, USA.
Matthew DunbabinBiopixel Oceans Foundation, Cairns, Australia.
Mark V ErdmannConservation International New Zealand, University of Auckland, 23 Symonds Street, Auckland, NZ 1020 New Zealand.
Luciana C FerreiraAustralian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS), Crawley, WA Australia.
Richard FitzpatrickBiopixel Oceans Foundation, Cairns, Australia.
Jorge FontesInstitute of Marine Research - IMAR, Department of Oceanography and Fisheries, University of the Azores, 9900-140 Horta, Portugal.
Adrian C GleissEnvironmental and Conservation Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA Australia.
Jonathan R GreenGalapagos Whale Shark Project, Puerto Ayora, Galapagos Islands Ecuador.
Lucas P GriffinDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620 USA.
Curtice R GriffinDepartment of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003 USA.
Royale S HardenstineMarine Science Program, Division of Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Abdi HassanFocal Species Program, Ocean & Science Department, Konservasi Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Alex R HearnGalapagos Science Center, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador.
Jill M HendonUniversity of Southern Mississippi, Ocean Springs, MS USA.
Mochamad Iqbal Herwata PutraFocal Species Program, Ocean & Science Department, Konservasi Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Eric HoffmayerNational Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Pascagoula, USA.
Lisa HoopesIUCN Center for Species Survival, Georgia Aquarium, Atlanta, GA USA.
Robert E HueterMote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota, FL USA.
Sajan JohnPan India Whale Shark Conservation Project, Wildlife Trust of India, F-13, Sector 8, Noida, NCR 201301 India.
Jake LevensonBureau of Ocean Energy Management-BOEM, Washington, DC USA.
Sonny LewisECOCEAN Inc., Coogee, WA Australia.
Bruno C L MacenaInstitute of Marine Research - IMAR, Department of Oceanography and Fisheries, University of the Azores, 9900-140 Horta, Portugal.
Mark G MeekanOceans Institute, University of Western Australia, WA, 6009 Australia.
Ingo B MillerBiopixel Oceans Foundation, Cairns, Australia.
Brad NormanECOCEAN Inc., Coogee, WA Australia.
Jens PaulsenMarine Megafauna Foundation, West Palm Beach, FL USA.
Cameron PerryIUCN Center for Species Survival, Georgia Aquarium, Atlanta, GA USA.
Simon J PierceMarine Megafauna Foundation, West Palm Beach, FL USA.
Samantha D ReynoldsECOCEAN Inc., Coogee, WA Australia.
David P RobinsonSundive Research, Byron Bay, NSW 2481 Australia.
Christoph A RohnerMarine Megafauna Foundation, West Palm Beach, FL USA.
Jennifer SchmidtShark Research Institute, Princeton, USA.
Edy SetyawanElasmobranch Institute Indonesia, Denpasar, Bali, 80226 Indonesia.
Abraham B SianiparElasmobranch Institute Indonesia, Denpasar, Bali, 80226 Indonesia.
Jamison SmithBlue World Research Institute, Cocoa, FL USA.
Simon R ThorroldBiology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA.
Michele ThumsAustralian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS), Crawley, WA Australia.
Rory WilsonSwansea Lab for Animal Movement, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales.
Emily J SouthallMarine Biological Association, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB UK.
David W SimsMarine Biological Association, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Biologging and telemetry have transformed our understanding of marine megafauna movement ecology. Yet, methodological constraints continue to limit data quality and deployment duration. Devices recording whale shark ( Results: Whale shark researcher responses to the survey highlighted clamp-based systems as a practical and more widely applicable approach than drill-based methods, which are often used to secure tags to other large sharks. They also noted that clamps have greater retention potential and are suitable for a wider range of tags compared to dart-based methods, but are still constrained by design, placement, and deployment conditions. Researchers used a variety of materials and designs to build their own clamps, often facilitated by direct collaboration with each other or key manufacturers. Clamps produced highly variable outcomes, ranging from successful long-term satellite transmissions over 200 days and short-term biologging for 48 h at 20 Hz, to premature detachment and cases of fin damage. For long-term clamps, changes in position on the fin allowed for more stable satellite transmissions over time. Some clamp designs achieved data quantity and quality close to that of drilled deployments, demonstrating their potential to rival traditional methods while offering a less invasive approach. Results emphasised the ongoing need for technological refinement and rigorous evaluation of clamp performance and associated impacts. Conclusions: Based on collective insights, we present a unified approach to clamp design and positioning, and identify key priorities for advancing this attachment technology, such as aiming for positions b-2 and c-2 on the fin and ensuring the clamp bridge distance (always between 30 and 50 mm) and tension are matched to shark size. Optimising clamp systems could substantially improve our ability to generate high-quality, long-duration movement data while minimising tagging impacts on the animal where possible. This could enhance ecological and conservation research outcomes for endangered whale sharks, with broader implications for tagging other large-bodied marine megafauna. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40317-026-00462-4.

Indexed as

Animal movementBiologging technologyConservation technologyMinimally-invasive techniquesRhincodon typusSatellite trackingSpatial ecology

Identifiers

PMID42292739
PMCPMC13263205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.