Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42292689›Full record

ReviewAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2026

Sex related differences in acute and recurrent pericarditis: A narrative review.

Nouf Alanazi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nouf AlanaziDepartment of Cardiac Sciences, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acute and recurrent pericarditis represent significant clinical challenges, with growing evidence suggesting important sex-related differences in their presentation, etiology, and course. This review synthesizes current knowledge on these disparities. Methods: Given the heterogeneity of available evidence and the limited number of studies with sex-specific analyses, this review was conducted in a narrative format. Discussion: While acute pericarditis is more prevalent in men, particularly at a younger age and often due to idiopathic or viral causes, women are more frequently affected at an older age and similarly mostly due to viral or idiopathic causes; however, women exhibit a stronger association with autoimmune etiologies compared to men. The clinical presentation also diverges, with men more often presenting with classic features like chest pain, pericardial rub, and characteristic electrocardiographic changes, whereas women may present with atypical features. A critical finding is that women face a higher burden of recurrent pericarditis, experiencing more frequent and severe episodes, which may be linked to their higher prevalence of autoimmune conditions and the subsequent greater use of corticosteroid therapy, which is a known risk factor for recurrence. Conclusion: Distinct sex-related patterns in acute and recurrent pericarditis necessitate a more tailored diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Further large-scale studies are warranted to definitively establish the links between sex hormones, autoimmune predisposition, and treatment outcomes to optimize patient care for both men and women.

Indexed as

Acute pericarditisAutoimmune diseaseGender differencesPericarditisRecurrent pericarditisSex differences

Identifiers

PMID42292689
PMCPMC13264112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.