ArticleJournal of biomedical physics & engineering2026
Advanced CNN Deep Learning Model for Diabetic Retinopathy Classification.
Article in Journal of biomedical physics & engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fusion of ConvNeXt-Tiny and Swin-Tiny backbones: a comparative analysis for diabetic retinopathy classification.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- RetinoDeep: Leveraging Deep Learning Models for Advanced Retinopathy Diagnostics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) is one of several retinal microvascular complications of Diabetes Mellitus (DM), a disease of increasing global prevalence. However, early detection and treatment can reduce or even prevent DR progression. In this work, Deep Learning (DL) techniques are used to grade DR from an early stage using either binary or multiclass classification as a clinical aid to help reduce the risk of patient vision loss. Objective: The primary objective of this research is to develop a low-cost, fast, and accurate automated system using DL for the early detection and classification of DR from retina fundus images. Material and Methods: This cross-sectional study employed three DL models, namely Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), decision tree, and logistic regression, to categorize three distinct clinically graded datasets, namely the Iraqi dataset, the Indian Diabetic Retinopathy Image Dataset (IDRiD) and the Eyepacs dataset, according to DR severity. Results: Evaluation of the DL model results showed that logistic regression emerged as the most effective, where accuracies of 99%, 99.3%, and 99.4% were achieved for the Iraqi, IDRiD, and Eyepacs datasets, respectively. Conversely, the decision-tree model achieved the lowest accuracy across the three datasets with 95.2%, 95.9%, and 96.0%, respectively. Conclusion: The logistic regression model demonstrated the highest overall accuracy of the three models for the classification of DR, with the Iraqi dataset with the highest accuracy of the three datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.