Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42292672›Full record

ArticleJournal of current glaucoma practice

Intraocular Pressure after Uneventful Phacoemulsification in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.

Zois Papadopoulos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of current glaucoma practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Zois PapadopoulosSchool of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7850-7731

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Phacoemulsification cataract surgery, the standard treatment for visually significant cataracts, has been shown to influence intraocular pressure (IOP); however, the extent and underlying mechanisms of this effect may differ in patients with systemic conditions such as diabetes mellitus. Although some evidence exists, studies have reported conflicting results regarding whether diabetic and nondiabetic patients exhibit differences in postoperative IOP changes following phacoemulsification. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate and compare postoperative IOP alterations in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted among 208 adults aged ≥50 years with cataract, including 104 diabetic and 104 nondiabetic patients. The study adhered to STROBE guidelines. IOP was measured preoperatively and at 1 and 6 weeks postoperatively using Goldmann applanation tonometry. Data normality was assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test, sphericity with Mauchly's test, and variance homogeneity with Levene's test. Repeated measures ANOVA evaluated changes in IOP over time and between groups, including time × group interactions, while linear mixed-effects modeling accounted for repeated measurements and estimated the magnitude of postoperative IOP changes. A Results: Repeated measures ANOVA showed significant effects of time ( Conclusion: Phacoemulsification effectively lowers IOP in older adults with cataract; however, the reduction is smaller in diabetic patients and is influenced by HbA1c levels and diabetes duration. Careful postoperative monitoring of IOP is recommended in diabetic individuals. A randomized controlled trial is How to cite this article: Papadopoulos Z. Intraocular Pressure after Uneventful Phacoemulsification in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients: A Prospective Observational Study. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2026;20(1):4-10.

Indexed as

CataractDiabetesIntraocular pressurePhacoemulsificationPostoperative

Identifiers

PMID42292672
PMCPMC13262224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.