Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42292624›Full record

ArticleTranslational pediatrics2026

Development and internal validation of a prognostic nomogram for poor outcomes in neonatal bacterial meningitis.

Min Yu, Yiping Fang, Xiaofeng Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Min YuDivision of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1695-8056
Yiping FangDivision of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Xiaofeng YangDivision of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neonatal bacterial meningitis (NBM) remains a life-threatening condition with considerable mortality and long-term neurodevelopmental impairment. Early prognostic assessment is challenging, and prediction models tailored to neonates are limited. This study aimed to develop and internally validate a prognostic nomogram for predicting poor outcomes in neonates with bacterial meningitis. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted including 214 neonates diagnosed with bacterial meningitis between 2011 and 2024. Independent predictors of poor outcome were identified using Firth penalized logistic regression to reduce small-sample bias. A prognostic nomogram was developed and internally validated using bootstrap resampling to assess model performance. Results: Among the 214 neonates, 83 (38.8%) experienced poor outcomes. Lower gestational age, seizures, elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein, and reduced CSF glucose were independently associated with poor prognosis. The model demonstrated good discrimination, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72-0.85] and an optimism-corrected C-index of 0.77 after bootstrap validation. Calibration analysis showed good agreement between predicted and observed probabilities. Decision curve analysis suggested net clinical benefit across threshold probabilities ranging from 0.05 to 0.65. Conclusions: This model integrates inflammatory biomarkers reflecting central nervous system injury with clinical parameters, providing a potential bridge between pathophysiological mechanisms and bedside risk stratification. External validation in independent cohorts is warranted prior to routine clinical application.

Indexed as

cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)Firth logistic regressionNeonatal bacterial meningitis (NBM)nomogramprognosis

Identifiers

PMID42292624
PMCPMC13263482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.