ReviewTranslational pediatrics2026
Host-response biomarker MxA for etiological discrimination of pediatric lower respiratory tract infections: implications for diagnostic study design.
Review in Translational pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Accurate differentiation between viral and bacterial etiologies remains a major clinical challenge in pediatric lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs), often leading to unnecessary antibiotic use. Host-response biomarkers such as myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) reflect interferon-mediated antiviral responses and offer a biologically grounded diagnostic approach. This review aims to synthesize current evidence on the diagnostic performance of MxA in pediatric LRTIs and to derive methodological insights for the design of future prospective diagnostic studies. Methods: A structured narrative review was conducted, integrating evidence from pediatric studies evaluating MxA across viral, bacterial, and mixed infections, with emphasis on study design features, reference standards, and biomarker performance. Results: MxA is consistently elevated in viral infections and demonstrates superior discriminatory performance compared with conventional inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT). In contrast, MxA remains low in most isolated bacterial infections, reflecting limited interferon activation. However, its performance declines in mixed infections, where intermediate expression patterns reduce classification accuracy. Combined biomarker strategies (e.g., MxA-CRP) improve discrimination by integrating complementary host-response signals. Conclusions: MxA is a promising host-response biomarker for pediatric LRTI. Future studies should incorporate standardized etiological definitions, explicitly defined mixed infection subgroups, age-specific reference ranges, and multi-marker strategies within pragmatic clinical pathways to enable clinical translation and optimize antibiotic stewardship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.