ReviewTranslational pediatrics2026
Isolated tricuspid regurgitation in structurally normal fetal hearts: a systematic review.
Review in Translational pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is increasingly identified during routine fetal echocardiography. Mild, transient TR may occur in structurally normal hearts, but in some cases, it reflects early hemodynamic imbalance or evolving pathology. This review summarizes current evidence on whether fetal TR in structurally normal hearts is clinically meaningful or simply a physiological finding. Methods: A structured literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase for studies published in English between January 2016 and January 2026. The search was limited to studies published from 2016 onward to ensure inclusion of data reflecting contemporary ultrasound technology and current fetal echocardiographic practice. Earlier studies were reviewed for background context but excluded from the systematic analysis to maintain methodological consistency. Search strategies combined descriptors related to fetal TR, Doppler or echocardiographic assessment, and structurally normal cardiac anatomy. We included original studies evaluating TR in fetuses with structurally normal hearts. Studies involving congenital heart disease (CHD), chromosomal abnormalities, mixed fetal-postnatal data without separable fetal results, or non-original publications were excluded. Eligible articles underwent full-text review, and data were extracted qualitatively for narrative synthesis. Results: A total of 42 records were identified through database searching, and 5 studies met the eligibility criteria after screening and removal of duplicates. All included studies evaluated TR in 845 fetuses with structurally normal hearts. Across cohorts, isolated TR was generally mild, transient, and most frequently detected in late gestation. None of the studies demonstrated an association between isolated TR and structural CHD, chromosomal abnormalities, or adverse perinatal outcomes. When follow-up echocardiography was available, TR typically regressed or resolved before delivery, and neonatal examinations were overwhelmingly normal. Conclusions: Available evidence suggests that isolated TR in fetuses with normal cardiac anatomy is a benign finding, particularly when detected in the third trimester. Across the included studies, TR did not correlate with structural heart disease or clinically relevant postnatal complications. Overall, isolated fetal TR appears to behave as a physiological or self-limited Doppler observation rather than a marker of underlying pathology. However, given the limited number of studies, further research is needed to refine diagnostic thresholds and clinical interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.