ReviewAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery2026
Innovations in transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions: what has failed, what has worked, what is coming.
Review in Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Innovation in transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention has advanced by learning from what did not work and expanding what does. Early attempts, often adapted from the mitral space, exposed practical constraints and safety tradeoffs that underscored how distinct the tricuspid valve is in anatomy, imaging, and physiology. Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair has shown improvement in symptoms, health status, and functional capacity with a favorable safety profile, when anatomy is suitable. Orthotopic transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) reliably abolishes regurgitation across complex anatomies, while ongoing iteration targets pacemaker rates, delivery system size, and right ventricular function. Heterotopic bicaval systems relieve venous congestion for patients unsuited to orthotopic solutions. These modalities are complementary in practice: repair is preferred when leaflet anatomy permits, TTVR is definitive when repair is unlikely to succeed, and caval approaches expand options for advanced disease. Looking ahead, the field is converging on devices and workflows that are simpler, smaller, and more anatomy-agnostic, with renewed interest in physiology-guided designs across new annuloplasty, replacement, spacer, and caval platforms. Longer-term readouts from randomized programs will test durability, right-sided remodeling, and hospitalization effects. Finally, responsible dissemination that emphasizes imaging expertise and structured pathways will be essential as access grows. Taken together, the field has moved from exploratory ideas to proven solutions and a credible near-term pipeline, positioning transcatheter therapy to deliver durable, patient-centered benefit for tricuspid regurgitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.