ArticleSpine surgery and related research2026
Ultrasound-Guided Lumbar Nerve Root Hydrodissection: Fluoroscopy-Assisted Evaluation of Injectate Distribution and Feasibility.
Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Selective nerve root block is commonly performed under fluoroscopy, but reports of ultrasound (US) guidance remain limited. Although hydrodissection has shown favorable outcomes in peripheral nerves, few studies have evaluated the lumbar nerve root. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the injectate distribution, reproducibility, safety, and clinical efficacy of US-guided hydrodissection of the lumbar nerve root (US-HNR) using fluoroscopic assistance. Methods: US-HNR was performed in 46 patients with lumbar radiculopathy between January and September 2025. A standardized injectate (contrast agent 3 mL, saline 6 mL, and lidocaine 1% 1 mL; total 10 mL) was administered. Distribution was classified into four types under fluoroscopy. The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and patient satisfaction were evaluated pre- and postprocedurally. Results: Contrast evaluation was possible in 40 patients. Distribution patterns were localized within the periradicular region of the target nerve root in 30%, ipsilateral epidural in 38%, contralateral epidural in 25%, and contralateral nerve root in 8%, suggesting localized spread in one-third of cases. NRS improved significantly from 7.1 to 5.0 at 1 week, 4.2 at 1 month, and 3.8 at 3 months (all Conclusions: US-HNR was safe and feasible, avoiding radiation and direct nerve puncture. This simple technique showed favorable clinical outcomes and may represent a promising treatment for lumbar radiculopathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.