ArticleEcology and evolution2026
Configurational Fragility of Forest Landscapes Under Multiple Anthropic Uses.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The conversion of native vegetation to anthropogenic land uses and landscape fragmentation are primary drivers of biodiversity loss and ecosystem services decline in tropical watersheds. Understanding how land use shapes the spatial configuration of forest fragments is essential to inform conservation and restoration strategies. We evaluated the configurational fragility of forest remains in the Lower São Francisco River Watershed, Brazil, combining structural metrics (area, core area and shape index) with land use and land cover (LULC). Fragility levels were defined through hierarchical classification and their relationship with LULC was tested using distance-based redundancy analysis (db-RDA). A principal component analysis (PCA) first summarized LULC variation. The watershed is dominated by anthropogenic matrices, with agriculture and pasture occupying 66.9% of the area, mainly pasture (57.7%). This resulted in 37,022 highly reduced and discontinuous forest fragments, of which 72.2% exhibited high configurational fragility. Savanna formation, the most representative native vegetation, had 96.1% of its patches within intermediate to high fragility levels. The PCA revealed three dominant gradients: herbaceous formations, wooded sandbank vegetation and wetlands (PC1), contrast between savanna formations and pasture (PC2), and heterogeneity of forests, forest plantation and mosaic of uses (PC3). db-RDA confirmed this pattern (adjusted
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.