ReviewEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice2026
Continuous-wave Doppler interrogation in valvular heart disease: pearls and pitfalls.
Review in European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Systolic Anterior Motion After Mitral Valve Repair: Echocardiographic Prediction, Surgical Prevention and Perioperative Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Continuous-wave Doppler (CWD) echocardiography remains a cornerstone in the haemodynamic assessment of valvular heart disease, providing critical insights into transvalvular flow, pressure gradients, and lesion severity. Beyond simple velocity measurements, the morphology, timing, intensity, and contour of Doppler waveforms contain rich physiological information that can refine diagnosis, risk stratification, and clinical decision-making. However, these signals are frequently underutilized or misinterpreted because accurate interpretation requires meticulous acquisition technique, understanding of Doppler physics, and integration with haemodynamic principles. This review discusses the fundamental principles underpinning CWD interrogation, including the Doppler and Bernoulli equations, and highlights the strengths, limitations, and common pitfalls encountered in clinical practice. We systematically review the application of CWD in aortic, mitral, tricuspid, and pulmonary valve disease, focusing on waveform morphology, velocity and gradient interpretation, pressure half-time, velocity-time integral, dimensionless indices, and Doppler signal intensity analysis. Particular emphasis is placed on complex haemodynamic scenarios, including low-flow states, dynamic obstruction, mixed valve disease, severe regurgitation, prosthetic valves, and discordant findings between Doppler and invasive measurements. The review also explores emerging concepts such as Doppler signal pixel intensity analysis and the future role of artificial intelligence in integrating high-density Doppler information into physiology-driven interpretation frameworks. Ultimately, Doppler echocardiography should not be viewed merely as a source of numerical outputs, but as a comprehensive bedside physiological tool requiring critical interpretation within the broader clinical and haemodynamic context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.