Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42292499›Full record

ReviewEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice2026

Continuous-wave Doppler interrogation in valvular heart disease: pearls and pitfalls.

Frank Timmermans, Edgar Argulian, Hatem Soliman-Aboumarie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Frank TimmermansDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 11, Ghent 9000, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9693-6406
Edgar ArgulianDepartment of Cardiology, Mount Sinai Morningside, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1111 Amsterdam Avenue, NewYork, NY 10025, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2106-2668
Hatem Soliman-AboumarieDepartment of Cardiac Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals Hill End Road, Uxbridge UB9 6JH, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3254-6820

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuous-wave Doppler (CWD) echocardiography remains a cornerstone in the haemodynamic assessment of valvular heart disease, providing critical insights into transvalvular flow, pressure gradients, and lesion severity. Beyond simple velocity measurements, the morphology, timing, intensity, and contour of Doppler waveforms contain rich physiological information that can refine diagnosis, risk stratification, and clinical decision-making. However, these signals are frequently underutilized or misinterpreted because accurate interpretation requires meticulous acquisition technique, understanding of Doppler physics, and integration with haemodynamic principles. This review discusses the fundamental principles underpinning CWD interrogation, including the Doppler and Bernoulli equations, and highlights the strengths, limitations, and common pitfalls encountered in clinical practice. We systematically review the application of CWD in aortic, mitral, tricuspid, and pulmonary valve disease, focusing on waveform morphology, velocity and gradient interpretation, pressure half-time, velocity-time integral, dimensionless indices, and Doppler signal intensity analysis. Particular emphasis is placed on complex haemodynamic scenarios, including low-flow states, dynamic obstruction, mixed valve disease, severe regurgitation, prosthetic valves, and discordant findings between Doppler and invasive measurements. The review also explores emerging concepts such as Doppler signal pixel intensity analysis and the future role of artificial intelligence in integrating high-density Doppler information into physiology-driven interpretation frameworks. Ultimately, Doppler echocardiography should not be viewed merely as a source of numerical outputs, but as a comprehensive bedside physiological tool requiring critical interpretation within the broader clinical and haemodynamic context.

Indexed as

continuous-wave DopplerDoppler haemodynamicsechocardiographyvalvular heart disease

Identifiers

PMID42292499
PMCPMC13257864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.