ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Impact of time-of-day on immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in cancer patients: an up-to-date clinical review.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Personalized medicine, scientific revolution or self-serving illusion: viewpoint from EORTC-PAMM Group.ESMO open · 2026Review
- Crosstalk Between Opioids and the Anti-Tumour Immune Checkpoint Axis.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Synchronizing immunity with time: unlocking the potential of chrono-immunotherapy in cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Circadian immunoregulation in cutaneous wound healing: from immune cell temporal heterogeneity to chronotherapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the last decade, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a cornerstone of the treatment of multiple cancer types. Several factors influence ICI efficacy and toxicity, and current research is investigating whether circadian timing of administration is one of them. This review is limited in scope to ICIs (anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-LAG-3) and does not detail other immunotherapeutic modalities (oncolytic viruses, cytokine therapies, adoptive cell transfer, cancer vaccines). We synthesised the findings, which are consistent with a role for the circadian rhythm in modulating normal immune function, including reported circadian variation in the activity of specific checkpoint molecules and immune cell populations. Several studies, predominantly retrospective, have reported associations between earlier-in-the-day ICI infusion and more favourable efficacy outcomes; however, the evidence base is heterogeneous, and the first randomised phase III trial currently subject to a Nature Medicine Editor's Note suggests that time of day (ToD) of ICI administration may be associated with differences in efficacy, with more heterogeneous signals for toxicity. Given the risk of immortal-time bias, cycle-number confounding and scheduling bias in retrospective datasets, additional multicentre prospective randomised trials are required to establish causality and reproducibility, alongside research into circadian biomarkers that could help personalise timing in routine clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.