Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42292468›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026

Computational discovery of

Li Luo, Jing Chen, Weiwei Du, Jianchuan Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Li LuoDepartment of Neonatology Nursing, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jing ChenDepartment of Neonatology Nursing, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Weiwei DuSichuan Provincial Center for Mental Health, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Jianchuan HuDepartment of Biotherapy, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neonatal sepsis is a life-threatening condition with high mortality. Ferroptosis and cuproptosis, oxidative stress-related cell death pathways, are implicated in sepsis pathogenesis, but their role in neonatal sepsis remains unclear. This study aimed to identify and validate diagnostic biomarkers for neonatal sepsis associated with ferroptosis and cuproptosis pathways using integrated bioinformatics and machine learning approaches, and to explore potential therapeutic targets. Methods: Transcriptomic data from neonatal sepsis patients (GSE69686, GSE25504) were analyzed. Differential expression analysis, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), and protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks were performed to identify cuproptosis- and ferroptosis-related genes (CFRGs). Three machine learning algorithms-LASSO, SVM-RFE, and XGBoost-were applied for feature selection. Immune infiltration was assessed via CIBERSORT. Molecular docking was used to screen FDA-approved drugs against candidate targets. Results: Three biomarkers- Conclusion:

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeonatal SepsisProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)BiomarkersComputational BiologyCuproptosisFerroptosisGene Expression ProfilingHumansInfant, NewbornMolecular Docking SimulationBiomarkersKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)cuproptosisdiagnostic biomarkersferroptosisimmune infiltrationmachine learningneonatal sepsis

Identifiers

PMID42292468
PMCPMC13259686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.