ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Real-world study of telitacicept in the treatment of IgA nephropathy.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of telitacicept for the treatment of immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN). Methods: This study enrolled patients with biopsy-confirmed IgAN who had 24-hour proteinuria exceeded 0.75 g/day and received telitacicept treatment for at least 3 months. Using propensity score matching, patients were matched in a 1:1:1 ratio with those who received only supportive or immunosuppressive (IS) therapy (glucocorticoid with or without mycophenolate mofetil). The primary outcomes were percentage changes in 24-hour proteinuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) during the 12-month follow-up period. Results: Each group included 24 patients. At 12 months, telitacicept reduced 24-hour proteinuria by 1.50 g/day (57.61%) from baseline, while the supportive treatment group had a reduction of 0.60 g/day (17.11%) and the IS treatment group had a reduction of 1.60 g/day (59.49%). The percentage change in 24-hour proteinuria in the telitacicept group was similar to that in the IS treatment group, and both groups were superior to the supportive treatment group. The telitacicept group exhibited a minor decline in eGFR of 2.1 mL/min/1.73 m Conclusion: Telitacicept can reduce 24-hour proteinuria in patients with IgAN and stabilize eGFR with good safety during follow-up. These findings suggest that telitacicept may represent a safer and effective therapeutic alternative to conventional IS regimens for reducing proteinuria and preserving renal function in patients with IgAN, particularly those at high risk of disease progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.