ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Distinct roles of dopamine receptors in HIV latency reversal in a myeloid cell model.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The prefrontal cortex as a target of HIV-1 neurotoxicity: molecular mechanisms of viral protein-mediated neurodegeneration and executive dysfunction.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Currently, studies on the interactions between neurotransmitters and immune cells that are targets of HIV are limited by a focus on single pathways at a time. The latent myeloid reservoir cells in the brain are a source of virus responsive to changes in the levels of dopamine (DA), caused by stimulant drugs such as methamphetamine (Meth), which, in part, explains the poor control of brain viral load in models of chronic Meth exposure. Among the effects of DA, HIV latency reversal is observed in a proportion of latent cells that turn on the transcription of viral genes. In this study, our goal was to define the specific DA receptors and pathways involved in latency reversal by DA, under the hypothesis that downstream effects of DA activating HIV transcription can be learned and serve as targets for future therapeutic purposes. Methods: We focused on DA receptor (DRD)1 and DRD4, using the selective agonists SKF38393 hydrobromide and PD168077 maleate, which, like DA, increased levels of p24 in culture supernatants. A single-cell approach identified cells and enriched phenotypes associated with positive transcription of HIV genes. Results: Interestingly, we found very little overlap between DA and the individual receptor clusters, pathways, and upstream regulators, while the two receptors exhibited higher phenotypic cluster similarities and a higher number of perturbed genes indicating cross-regulation. Yet, between conditions, different pathways were convergent in isolated signatures and by their overall involvement in inflammation. Discussion: While Meth was a major contextual motivation for this work, the implications of these findings extend beyond stimulant use disorders, indicating that neuroimmune interactions are complex with resulting phenotypes derived from a combination of signaling pathways. The results suggest that latency reversal by DA in myeloid targets, especially in the brain, can occur with the contribution of DRDs' signaling via a diversity of inflammatory pathways that have cell activation as a common feature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.