ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
The potential involvement of FABP4 in rheumatoid arthritis-associated osteoporosis: a comprehensive bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study investigates the role and underlying mechanism of FABP4 in RA secondary OP by examining its correlation with the condition. Methods: DEGs related to RA and OP were identified using GEO datasets (GSE17755 and GSE230665), focusing on bone metabolism genes. Candidate genes were identified using WGCNA, PPI networks, and four algorithms (Degree, BottleNeck, MCC, EPC), followed by enrichment analysis. Key genes were pinpointed using machine learning methods (SVM-RFE, LASSO, Boruta) and validated with ROC curves, all showing AUC > 0.7. MicroRNA prediction and genomic mapping were also done. For Results: Bioinformatics identified eight hub genes: PTEN, CDC42, MFN2, UBC, RAS5F1, MMP9, CCL17, and FABP4. In CIA rats, FABP4, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, RANKL, and β-CTX levels rose with disease progression, showing slight increases at 2 weeks and significant rises at 6 and 12 weeks (P<0.05). At 12 weeks, these levels were higher than at 6 weeks (P<0.01). FABP4 levels positively correlated with TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, RANKL, and β-CTX (P<0.01). Micro-CT showed worsening ankle joint damage over time. At 2 weeks, CIA rats had no significant BS/BV difference from controls but showed decreased BV/TV and Tb.Th and increased Tb.Sp (P<0.05). At 6 and 12 weeks, CIA rats had significantly lower BV/TV, BS/BV, and Tb.Th and higher Tb.Sp compared to controls (P<0.01). IHC analysis showed high FABP4, TNF-α, and RANKL expression in CIA rats' synovium and cartilage at 2 weeks. TNF-α levels stabilized by 6 weeks and returned to normal by 12 weeks. FABP4 peaked at 12 weeks, while RANKL decreased but stayed above 2-week levels. Conclusion: FABP4 is closely associated with abnormal bone metabolism in RA secondary OP, potentially through the RANKL/RANK/OPG system. It may represent a potential therapeutic target that warrants further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.