ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Etiological study of pulmonary infections following solid organ transplantation using metagenomic next-generation sequencing and development of a risk prediction model: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the pathogenic etiology of pulmonary infection after solid organ transplantation and construct a prognostic prediction model based on metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) technology, systematically identifying key predictors to provide evidence for clinical risk stratification and individualized interventions. Methods: Clinical data were retrospectively collected from patients who developed pulmonary infection after liver or kidney transplantation at a single hospital between January 2020 and December 2023. All patients underwent mNGS detection of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid or sputum for pathogen identification. Collected data included demographic characteristics, transplant-related parameters, underlying diseases, laboratory test results, mNGS pathogen detection outcomes, and prognostic indicators. The dataset was randomly divided into a training set (n=262) and a test set (n=66). Within an AutoML framework, model hyperparameters were optimized using the Improved Dharma Optimization Algorithm (IDRA). Feature importance was validated bidimensionally via LASSO regression and SHAP interpretable models, with an interactive MATLAB-based decision support system developed. Results: The overall positive detection rate of pathogens by mNGS significantly exceeded that of conventional methods (84.76% vs. 61.89%, P<0.001). No statistically significant differences existed in baseline characteristics or laboratory indicators between the training and test sets (all P>0.05), confirming randomized stratified sampling validity. Both cohorts showed highly consistent proportions of poor prognosis events (training set: 27.48% vs. test set: 28.79%, χ Conclusion: Integrating multidimensional clinical data with explainable machine learning techniques, this study confirms the central role of pathogenic etiology characteristics in prognostic prediction for post-transplant pulmonary infection and demonstrates the potential for real-time risk assessment to inform clinical decisions. However, prospective validation across diverse care settings is required to establish its efficacy as an interventional guide. This work offers innovative tools and methodological frameworks to advance precision diagnosis and management, subject to ongoing refinement through multicenter collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.