ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
The effects of unilateral deprivation amblyopia on fixation stability.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Deprivation amblyopia is a neurodevelopmental disorder caused by obstruction of the visual pathway due to congenital cataracts, ptosis or corneal opacities that occur during early visual development. Visual deficits persist into adulthood even though the obstruction (e.g. cataracts) have been removed early in life. The effects of deprivation amblyopia on oculomotor control have not been studied. The present study evaluates the effects of unilateral deprivation amblyopia resulting from congenital cataracts on fixation stability. Method: Seven adults with unilateral deprivation amblyopia and 18 adults with normal vision were tested during binocular and monocular viewing. A video-based eye tracker was used to record eye position of the viewing eye(s) (closed-loop condition with visual feedback) and the covered eye (open-loop condition with no visual feedback). Results: Findings for the control group were consistent with previous studies. Fixation stability (eye position stability), evaluated using bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA), microsaccade rate, amplitude and slow drift velocity, was best during binocular viewing, and significantly worse during open-loop monocular viewing. In comparison to the control group, patients had similar fellow eye fixation stability under binocular viewing, but fixation (eye position stability) was poorer under monocular closed-loop and open-loop viewing. Fixation stability was worst in the amblyopic eye in all viewing conditions. Discussion: Our findings demonstrate fixation stability deficits in adults with unilateral deprivation amblyopia, underscoring the lasting impact of early visual deprivation on oculomotor function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.