ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Multimodal imaging-based targeting approach for network-level brain stimulation.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Neural network effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are poorly understood. Here, we introduce a prospective, empirically informed, multimodal functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) framework for guiding target selection and hypothesis-based analysis in future focal tDCS-fMRI studies. Methods: We illustrate our approach by using data of 37 healthy individuals (19 females; mean age ± SD = 25.8 ± 5.9) recruited from two tDCS-fMRI studies that were acquired at the same scanner and with placebo-tDCS. Participants completed two resting-state (RS) sessions and two task-fMRI sessions (object-location memory, OLM, or associative picture-pseudoword learning, APPL, experiments). Seed-based RS analysis identified functional networks originating from target regions for focal tDCS (right occipito-temporal cortex, rOTC; left ventral IFG, lvIFG) and established their test-retest reliability (TRR), using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Dice coefficients quantified overlap between seeded RS networks and task-evoked activity to identify task-active regions potentially affected by downstream network effects from the target regions. Results: Seed-based analyses identified highly reliable ventral visual-limbic (rOTC) and language-related networks (lvIFG), with 72-77% of voxels showing good-to-excellent TRR (ICC ≥ 0.75). Only a subset of network voxels identified by the RS analyses overlapped with activity elicited by the experimental paradigms (ranging from 7.5-55%), with larger correspondence for the OLM (Dice: 0.249-0.349; APPL 0.065-0.106). Therefore, the degree of potential tDCS network effects varied substantially depending on the target region, the extent of its functional network and task-specific activity patterns. Degree of correspondence was further mediated by the selected contrasts-of-interest in the task-based analyses, with more conservative control conditions resulting in reduced overlap. Conclusion: In sum, we established a principled multimodal fMRI framework bridging a critical gap in neuromodulation research. By integrating reliable intrinsic connectivity maps with task-evoked activity patterns, we provide a method to prospectively identify network-level targets for focal brain stimulation and generate hypotheses for tDCS-fMRI analyses. This approach shifts the rationale from stimulating isolated brain regions to strategically targeting key nodes within a predefined functional pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.