Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42292339›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026

Combined repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation for upper limb recovery in chronic incomplete cervical spinal cord injury: protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Ravi Shankar, Ning Tang, Gobinathan Chandran

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07586644 (Combined Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation for Upper Limb Recovery in Chronic Incomplete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07586644 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2027, after this paper: background citation

Combined Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation for Upper Limb Recovery in Chronic Incomplete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational University Hospital, SingaporeRan2027 to 2028Enrolled24ConditionsSpinal Cord Injuries (SCI)ArmsTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation, Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ravi ShankarClinical Research & Innovation Office, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, National Healthcare Group, Singapore, Singapore.
Ning TangDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Gobinathan ChandranDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) results in severe upper limb impairment, with restoration of hand and arm function ranked as the highest rehabilitation priority by individuals with tetraplegia. Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has emerged as a promising approach for enhancing upper limb recovery. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), an efficient form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, can enhance cortical excitability and descending motor drive. However, the benefit of combining these complementary neuromodulation modalities to simultaneously target supraspinal and spinal circuits has not been evaluated in a controlled trial. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of combined cortical neuromodulation (iTBS) and spinal neuromodulation (tSCS) versus tSCS alone, each paired with standardized upper limb rehabilitation, for improving upper limb motor function in chronic incomplete cervical SCI. Methods: This single-center, two-arm, assessor-blinded, pilot randomized controlled trial will enroll 24 adults aged 21-65 years with chronic (more than 12 months post-injury) incomplete cervical SCI (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade C or D, neurological level C2 to C8) at Alexandra Hospital, Singapore. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive either iTBS combined with tSCS plus standardized upper limb rehabilitation or tSCS plus upper limb rehabilitation alone. Interventions will be delivered twice weekly for 12 weeks (24 sessions). The primary outcome is the change in Upper Extremity Motor Score from baseline to 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes include measures of upper limb function, independence, spasticity, corticospinal excitability, quality of life, and goal attainment. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, post-intervention, and at 4- and 12-week follow-up. Results: This protocol was approved by the National Healthcare Group Domain Specific Review Board. Recruitment is expected to begin in the third quarter of 2026, with data collection anticipated to be completed by the fourth quarter of 2027. Conclusion: This pilot trial will provide the first controlled evidence on whether adjunctive cortical neuromodulation via iTBS produces additional upper limb motor recovery beyond tSCS-based rehabilitation in chronic incomplete cervical SCI. Feasibility data and effect size estimates will inform the design of a subsequent multicenter confirmatory trial. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT07586644.

Indexed as

cervical spinal cord injuryconvergent neuromodulationintermittent theta burst stimulationneuromodulationneuroplasticitypilot randomized controlled trialrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationtetraplegia

Identifiers

PMID42292339
PMCPMC13254184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.