Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42292334›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026

Visual symptom burden after traumatic brain injury: a case-control evaluation of the Arabic BIVSS.

Nawaf M Almutairi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nawaf M AlmutairiDepartment of Optometry, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To compare visual symptoms between adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and controls using the Brain Injury Vision Symptom Survey (BIVSS) and identify the domains with the largest differences. Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional case-control study, 43 adults with TBI and 54 controls in Qassim, Saudi Arabia, completed the 28-item BIVSS. Total and eight domain scores (visual clarity, visual comfort, double vision, light sensitivity, dry eye, depth perception, peripheral vision, reading) were compared with Welch's Results: Groups were similar in age and gender. TBI participants reported higher total BIVSS scores than controls (27.9 vs. 13.1; Conclusion: Adults with TBI reported substantially greater vision-related symptoms on the Arabic BIVSS than controls, with prominent differences in two out of eight domains: visual comfort and reading. The BIVSS supports symptom profiling to flag patients for targeted visual assessment after TBI; it is not a diagnostic test, and cut-offs are exploratory and sample-specific, requiring external validation. Cross-sectional differences between acute and chronic subgroups warrant longitudinal study before inferences about recovery can be drawn.

Indexed as

BIVSSconcussionneuro-ophthalmologyneuro-optometrysymptom assessmenttraumatic brain injuryvision disordersvisual rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID42292334
PMCPMC13253801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.