Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42292305›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X2026

Bone-seeking nanomaterials for rebalancing bone remodeling in osteoporosis.

Fei Wang, Feng Liang, Xiaonan Zhou, Yuanyuan Ding, Mingzhe Wu, Nan Li, Fei Wang, Wei Yan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of pharmaceutics: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fei WangDepartment of Orthopedics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
Feng LiangDepartment of Orthopedics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
Xiaonan ZhouDepartment of Orthopedics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
Yuanyuan DingDepartment of Pain, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
Mingzhe WuDepartment of Gynecology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
Nan LiDepartment of Pediatric, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
Fei WangDepartment of Otolaryngology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
Wei YanDepartment of Pediatric Orthopedics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a prevalent skeletal disorder characterized by reduced bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration, primarily resulting from an imbalance between osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and osteoblast-mediated bone formation. Although current anti-osteoporosis drugs can slow bone loss or stimulate bone formation, their clinical effectiveness is often limited by poor bone specificity, systemic side effects, and insufficient restoration of physiological bone remodeling. Recently, bone-seeking nanomaterials have emerged as a promising strategy to enhance therapeutic precision in osteoporosis. By integrating bone-targeting ligands with engineered nanocarriers, these systems enable preferential accumulation in mineralized tissues and improve the local delivery of therapeutic agents. In addition to conventional anti-resorptive and anabolic drugs, nanoplatforms have been developed to deliver nucleic acids, growth factors, and immunomodulatory molecules that regulate the complex cellular networks governing bone remodeling. This review summarizes recent advances in bone-targeted nanomaterial design, discusses their roles in modulating osteoclasts, osteoblasts, osteocytes, and osteoimmune interactions, and highlights key challenges and future opportunities for the clinical translation of nanomedicine in osteoporosis therapy. Distinct from prior reviews that often emphasize nanocarrier composition or individual payload classes, this review is organized around the concept of rebalancing bone remodeling and integrates osteoclast, osteoblast, osteocyte, and osteoimmune regulation with emerging translational considerations.

Indexed as

Bone regenerationBone-seeking nanomaterialsBone-targeted drug deliveryOsteoclast–osteoblast couplingOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID42292305
PMCPMC13260210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.