ReviewInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X2026
Bone-seeking nanomaterials for rebalancing bone remodeling in osteoporosis.
Review in International journal of pharmaceutics: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a prevalent skeletal disorder characterized by reduced bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration, primarily resulting from an imbalance between osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and osteoblast-mediated bone formation. Although current anti-osteoporosis drugs can slow bone loss or stimulate bone formation, their clinical effectiveness is often limited by poor bone specificity, systemic side effects, and insufficient restoration of physiological bone remodeling. Recently, bone-seeking nanomaterials have emerged as a promising strategy to enhance therapeutic precision in osteoporosis. By integrating bone-targeting ligands with engineered nanocarriers, these systems enable preferential accumulation in mineralized tissues and improve the local delivery of therapeutic agents. In addition to conventional anti-resorptive and anabolic drugs, nanoplatforms have been developed to deliver nucleic acids, growth factors, and immunomodulatory molecules that regulate the complex cellular networks governing bone remodeling. This review summarizes recent advances in bone-targeted nanomaterial design, discusses their roles in modulating osteoclasts, osteoblasts, osteocytes, and osteoimmune interactions, and highlights key challenges and future opportunities for the clinical translation of nanomedicine in osteoporosis therapy. Distinct from prior reviews that often emphasize nanocarrier composition or individual payload classes, this review is organized around the concept of rebalancing bone remodeling and integrates osteoclast, osteoblast, osteocyte, and osteoimmune regulation with emerging translational considerations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.