ArticleInternational journal of breast cancer2026
Preliminary Effectiveness of the Comprehensive Oncology Rehabilitation and Exercise (CORE) Clinical Workflow Algorithm on Health Outcomes During Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer Care.
Article in International journal of breast cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04594473 (The Feasibility and Acceptability of a Comprehensive Oncology Rehabilitation and Exercise), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Feasibility and Acceptability of a Comprehensive Oncology Rehabilitation and Exercise (CORE) Program Among Breast Cancer Survivors
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Preliminary Effectiveness of the Comprehensive Oncology Rehabilitation and Exercise (CORE) Clinical Workflow Algorithm on Health Outcomes During Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer Care.International journal of breast cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The Comprehensive Oncology Rehabilitation and Exercise (CORE) pilot trial aimed to test the feasibility and acceptability of a clinical workflow algorithm that integrated exercise and rehabilitation services from breast cancer diagnosis throughout the first 24 weeks of care. Here, we investigated the preliminary effectiveness of the CORE algorithm compared with standard of care (SOC) on changes in physical function, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and exercise engagement in women newly diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer with plans for surgery as first-line treatment. Methods: Seventy-two women were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to CORE or SOC. All participants completed study assessments at three time points that aligned with routine breast surgical oncology clinic visits: surgical consultation (i.e., baseline), postoperative, and 24 weeks postoperative. The following outcomes and associated assessments were carried out in the clinic: physical function: PROMIS physical function survey (primary function assessment), five-time chair stand, 10-m walk, back scratch, and QuickDASH survey; HRQoL: FACT-B survey; and exercise engagement: modified Godin physical activity survey (primary engagement assessment) and accelerometer wear for 1 week following each clinic visit. Results: Fifty-nine participants had evaluable data, with the majority having Stage I disease (83%), being primarily White (75%) and non-Hispanic (90%), and having a median age and BMI of 58 years and 26.0 kg/m Conclusion: The CORE clinical workflow algorithm demonstrates promise in improving exercise engagement. More work is needed in an adequately powered trial to confirm these findings and evaluate effectiveness on other outcomes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04594473.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.