ArticleBrain & spine2026
Development and validation of a machine learning model utilizing the ACS-NSQIP database for predicting early postoperative Re-operation in lumbar microdiscectomy.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Early re-operation secondary to postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) in lumbar microdiscectomy, although rare, poses significant morbidity and healthcare burden. Research question: Given the variable performance of traditional statistical and machine learning (ML) models in predicting this outcome, this study aimed to develop and validate a ML model to accurately predict 30-day re-operation following SSI in patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy. Material and methods: De-identified patient data were obtained from American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP), focusing on patients with microdiscectomy. After applying inclusion criteria, 79,870 eligible cases were analyzed, of which 462 (0.6%) experienced re-operation following SSI. A nested cross-validation pipeline with Bayesian optimization was implemented using extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) combined with Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE), and multiple classification thresholds were evaluated. Model interpretability was assessed through SHapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) to identify the most influential predictors. Results: The final model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.996, with accuracy consistently at 0.993 and sensitivity of 0.924-0.985 across thresholds. Specificity remained at 0.993, while the positive predictive value fluctuated modestly (0.436-0.437), and the negative predictive value was 1.000. SHAP analysis highlighted any SSI, race, smoking status, diabetic status, and revised Risk Analysis Index scores as top predictors influencing re-operation risk. Discussion and conclusion: An optimized ML approach incorporating synthetic data augmentation yielded high predictive performance for an infrequent yet critical complication of lumbar microdiscectomy. These findings underscore the potential of data-driven models to enhance perioperative risk stratification and support targeted preventive strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.