Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42292275›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Refractive and visual changes in the fellow eye after unilateral refractive surgery in patients with anisometropia.

Yanjun Hu, Ruixuan Xu, Yuhua Tong, Meiting Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yanjun HuDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, China.
Ruixuan XuClinical Medical College, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.
Yuhua TongDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, China.
Meiting YuDepartment of Nursing, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the changes in visual acuity and refractive status of the fellow eye after unilateral refractive surgery in patients with anisometropia and to analyze their correlation with factors such as age, degree of anisometropia, and type of ametropia. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 43 patients with anisometropia who underwent unilateral refractive surgery at the Quzhou People's Hospital, Zhejiang Province, from January 2023 to June 2025. All patients underwent femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) or femtosecond laser-assisted excimer laser Results: The preoperative SE of the operated eye was -2.95 ± 1.84 D, and that of the fellow eye was (-0.25 ± 0.46) D, with a binocular anisometropia difference of 2.71 ± 1.69 D. Within 6 months postoperatively, the refraction of the operated eye remained stable (time main effect Conclusion: In patients with anisometropia undergoing unilateral refractive surgery, the fellow eye may experience transient, reversible refractive fluctuations in the early postoperative period, most pronounced at 1 week postoperatively. However, logMAR visual acuity remains stable, indicating the good safety of this surgical approach. Clinicians need not intervene excessively or perform prophylactic bilateral surgery out of concern for visual acuity decline in the fellow eye.

Indexed as

anisometropiafellow eyeLogMAR visual acuityspherical equivalentunilateral refractive surgery

Identifiers

PMID42292275
PMCPMC13259697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.