ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Patterns and prevalence of ophthalmic self-medication in Bulgaria: results from a cross-sectional survey.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ophthalmic self-medication, defined as the use of over-the-counter eye medications without prescription, represents a significant public health concern due to potential complications such as delayed diagnosis, antimicrobial resistance, and vision impairment. Despite its global prevalence, data on this practice in Bulgaria remain limited. This study aimed to comprehensively assess the prevalence, patterns, determinants, and self-reported outcomes of ophthalmic self-medication among adults in Bulgaria. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between March and May 2025 among adults aged ≥18 years residing in Bulgaria. An anonymous questionnaire comprising 15 items assessed sociodemographic characteristics, ocular complaints, motivations for self-medication, perceived safety and knowledge, and self-reported outcomes. A total of 1,000 respondents were included in the analysis. Descriptive statistics and inferential analyses (Pearson's chi-square and Fisher's exact test with Monte Carlo simulation) were performed, with statistical significance set at Results: The sample was predominantly female (90.8%), aged 31-50 years (75.6%), highly educated (85.1%), and employed (83.1%). The prevalence of ophthalmic self-medication was 63.7%. The most common complaints were infectious conditions (37.3%) and dry-eye symptoms (23.1%). Primary motivations included lack of time to seek specialist care (41.1%) and the perception that consultation was unnecessary (33.7%). Most participants (66.2%) considered self-medication safe, while 39.6% reported poor or no knowledge of ophthalmic medications. Among self-treated respondents ( Conclusion: Ophthalmic self-medication was highly prevalent in this Bulgarian sample and was primarily driven by accessibility barriers and perceived low necessity for specialist consultation. Although adverse events were rarely reported, the discrepancy between perceived safety and self-assessed knowledge highlights potential risks. These findings underscore the need for targeted patient education, improved access to ophthalmic care, and pharmacist-supported referral strategies to promote safer self-care practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.