ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Beyond traditional metrics: the holistic role of multisource feedback in comprehensive dental clinical education.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: With dental education progressively moving toward competency-based training models, the importance of multidimensional evaluation has continued to grow. This study introduces multisource feedback into clinical internships of undergraduate dental students for the first time. Methods: In this study, we developed a tailored 360-degree evaluation system for undergraduate clinical training. Participants included 77 students, two clinical instructors, and one nursing staff from PKUSS. A total of 913 questionnaires were distributed electronically to all eligible participants. Assessment scores were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Competency differences between the two clinical instructors were compared using a paired-samples Results: The overall response rate was 98.8%. The dental students achieved an average total score of 86.78, demonstrating good performance across all competency domains-professionalism, clinical competence, communication and collaboration, and learning capacity. The two clinical instructors scored 90.63 and 91.37, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between them. However, significant differences were observed among the three rater groups-clinical instructors, the nursing staff, and peers-in their assessments of students' collaboration ( Conclusion: Multisource feedback enables a comprehensive assessment of both medical students' competencies and the teaching abilities of instructors. The students demonstrated strong professionalism; however, there is still room for improvement in areas such as comprehensive diagnosis and treatment, collaboration, and communication skills. Further exploration and improvement are needed to effectively provide targeted training, thereby improving the effectiveness of clinical internships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.