ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Clinical outcomes of tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in patients with tricuspid regurgitation.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the association between tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with tricuspid regurgitation (TR) compared with medical therapy alone. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX global federated health research network. Adults with TR between 2015 and 2025 were identified and categorized into T-TEER and non-procedure groups. Propensity score matching was performed to balance baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included heart failure exacerbation, emergency department visits, hospitalization, and major adverse kidney events (MAKEs). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: After matching, 483 patients were included in each group. T-TEER was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality at 1 year (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.41-0.86), with sustained benefit at 3 years (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.48-0.88) and 5 years (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.91). T-TEER was also associated with reduced risks of heart failure exacerbation (HR 0.51), hospitalization (HR 0.60), emergency visits (HR 0.63), and MAKEs (HR 0.60) at 1 year. These associations remained consistent across longer follow-up. Conclusion: In this large real-world cohort, T-TEER was associated with lower risks of mortality and adverse clinical outcomes compared with medical therapy alone. These findings support the potential prognostic benefit of T-TEER in patients with TR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.