ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Neuropsychiatric adverse events of SGLT2 inhibitors: a pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system database.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To systematically analyze the occurrence features, temporal trends and risk signals of neuropsychiatric adverse events (AEs) linked to three sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin), and provide evidence for clinical safe medication. Methods: We extracted primary suspected (PS) only SGLT2 inhibitor-related reports from the FAERS database (2015Q4-2025Q3) after standardized deduplication. Descriptive analysis, dual disproportionality analysis ( Results: A total of 141,555 eligible AE reports were included, with 11,071 neuropsychiatric AEs (7.82%). Annual trends differed; males and 45-65-year-olds were high-risk. Diabetic neuropathy was a class-wide signal; each drug had unique signals. Time-stratified analysis confirmed signal robustness. Central nervous system vascular disorders were a cross-indication core signal. Conclusion: The three SGLT2 inhibitors have non-negligible neuropsychiatric risks with population/indication differences and class/drug-specific signals. All findings represent exploratory safety signals and do not confirm causal relationships between SGLT2 inhibitors and neuropsychiatric adverse events. Limitations include no indication confounding adjustment or multiple testing correction, as well as inherent flaws of FAERS such as reporting bias, underreporting, and outcome heterogeneity. Targeted monitoring is warranted for clinical awareness, but changes in clinical practice require further confirmation in large observational cohorts or prospective studies, especially for elderly/non-diabetic patients on dapagliflozin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.