ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Development of a quality indicator set for the responsibility-based holistic nursing model: a Delphi study based on the donabedian framework.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The responsibility-based holistic nursing model is widely implemented in Chinese hospitals. However, a structured quality indicator set for assessing this model is still absent. We aim to develop a standardized quality indicator set, thereby providing a reference for the further implementation of this methodology. Methods: Using the "structure-process-outcome" quality framework as a theoretical foundation, evaluation indicators for the responsibility-based holistic nursing model were constructed through a literature review and semi-structured interviews with nursing staff. A two-round Delphi survey was performed with 18 nursing experts to determine content validity and achieve consensus. Indicator weights were calculated using the normalized mean importance score method. Results: The response rates for both sets of correspondence questionnaires were 100%. The expert authority levels were 0.904 and 0.895, and the Kendall's coefficients of concordance were 0.153 and 0.182, both with Conclusion: This study established a preliminary quality indicator set for the responsibility-based holistic nursing model based on the Donabedian framework. Developed with moderate expert consensus, the indicator set offers a reference for evaluating nursing quality in hospitals. However, its practical applicability remains to be validated through clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.