Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42292197›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Fluoroscopy-guided removal of a migrated non-palpable implanon adherent to the ulnar nerve: a case report.

Changsung Han, Chungwon Lee

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Changsung HanDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Chungwon LeeDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although subdermal contraceptive implants are highly effective, they can create various complications if they migrate or become non-palpable, especially when adjacent to neurovascular structures. Ultrasound guidance and hydrodissection are commonly used to remove migrated implants; however, these techniques are not practical in certain cases. We report the case of a 33-year-old left-handed woman who presented with persistent abnormal bleeding 3 years post-etonogestrel implant placement. The implant was non-palpable upon presentation, and previous removal attempts had failed. Imaging revealed that the implant was located deep in the upper arm, adjacent to the ulnar nerve. Ultrasound guidance and hydrodissection were unsuccessful; therefore, fluoroscopy guidance was used to safely extract the implant, which had adhered to the ulnar nerve. The patient was discharged on the same day. By the 2-week follow-up visit, the incision had healed well, and the patient reported that the transient tingling sensation-which had occurred intraoperatively due to minimal traction during the final dissection-had completely resolved. Fluoroscopy-guided implant removal is effective for the removal of deeply placed or migrated implants, particularly when conventional methods fail; however, accurate localization and referral to specialists are essential for their safe removal.

Indexed as

contraceptive implantetonogestrelfluoroscopyforeign bodyulnar nerve

Identifiers

PMID42292197
PMCPMC13260297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.