Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42292091›Full record

ArticleJTCVS techniques2026

Improved reachability during bronchoscopy with a novel multisection robotic bronchoscope.

Paolo de Angelis, Bassel Tfayli, Hussein Kharroubi, Fumitaro Masaki, Joshua Brady, Lori Foley, Fayez Kheir, Hisashi Tsukada, Yolonda L Colson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTCVS techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paolo de AngelisDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Massachusetts General Brigham, Boston, Mass.
Bassel TfayliDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Massachusetts General Brigham, Boston, Mass.
Hussein KharroubiDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Massachusetts General Brigham, Boston, Mass.
Fumitaro MasakiDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Massachusetts General Brigham, Boston, Mass.
Joshua BradyDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Massachusetts General Brigham, Boston, Mass.
Lori FoleyTranslational Discovery Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass.
Fayez KheirDepartment of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.
Hisashi TsukadaDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Massachusetts General Brigham, Boston, Mass.
Yolonda L ColsonDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Massachusetts General Brigham, Boston, Mass.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The incidence of pulmonary nodules (PNs) has increased as the result of expanded lung cancer screening. PNs are often difficult to access with conventional bronchoscopy. We report data from the first cadaveric assessment of a novel multisection robotic bronchoscope (snake robot, or SR) with follow-the-leader navigation. Methods: This study was conducted in a human cadaver by 3 operators. The SR was compared against a conventional (OL-6.3) and thin bronchoscope (OL-4.2). Primary outcome was number of airway generations traversed from carina. Secondary outcomes included insertion depth, computed tomography-to-body divergence, and estimated volumes of lung parenchyma accessible for biopsy. Mann-Whitney Results: The SR reached greater median airway generations (6 [5-8]) when compared with the OL-6.3 (4 [3-4]; Conclusions: The SR outperformed both the OL-6.3 and OL-4.2 with regard to reach within the tracheobronchial tree, resulting in significant additional lung parenchyma accessible for biopsy.

Indexed as

bronchoscopylung nodulelung volumerobotic bronchoscopytransbronchial biopsy

Identifiers

PMID42292091
PMCPMC13261240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.