ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2026
A Prospective, Observational Study Evaluating the Impact and Safety of an Emergency Physician Collaboration With a Nurse Triage Phone Line.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study Objective: Nurse triage phone lines (NTPLs) are widely used to guide patients to appropriate care levels, often relying on conservative clinical decision support systems (CDSS). This study describes the association of integrating emergency medicine physician consultation (TeleEM) with NTPL recommendations, and subsequent emergency department (ED) utilization. Methods: From October 2020 to July 2024, a prospective, observational study was conducted across a multistate health system. TeleEM physicians reviewed NTPL cases for which nurse staff requested consultation and could agree with, upgrade, or downgrade the CDSS recommendation. Seventy-two-hour ED utilization following TeleEM consultation was also assessed. Results: Among 15,196 TeleEM consults, physicians agreed with the CDSS in 56% of cases, downgraded to a less urgent endpoint in 34% of cases (n = 5164), and upgraded to a more urgent endpoint in 10% of cases (n = 1517). Of downgraded patients, 32.1% (n = 1656) presented to the ED within 72 hours, and 92.2% of those were discharged from the ED. Of upgraded patients, 72.7% (n = 1,103) presented to the ED within 72 hours, and 88.5% of those were discharged from the ED. The most common ED chief complaints among downgraded patients who presented within 72 hours were chest pain (12.9%), abdominal pain (7.0%), and dizziness (4.6%). Conclusions: Integrating emergency physician input into NTPL calls was associated with changes in triage disposition in >40% of cases. Among patients whose recommendations were downgraded, lower observed ED utilization was seen relative to patients whose recommendations were upgraded, although nearly one-third of downgraded patients still presented to the ED within 72 hours. These findings should be interpreted as associative rather than causal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.