ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2026
Design and experimental validation of a soft pneumatic robotic device for preterm infant skin-to-skin tactile therapy.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin-to-skin tactile stimulation plays a critical role in the neurodevelopment of preterm infants, contributing to improved physiological stability, sensory integration, and caregiver bonding. However, the delivery of consistent tactile therapy in neonatal intensive care units is often limited by the availability of trained personnel and the inherent variability of manual application. This creates a need for assistive technologies capable of reproducing clinically relevant tactile stimuli in a controlled and repeatable manner. This work presents a soft pneumatic robotic system designed to replicate clinically inspired tactile stimulation for neonatal therapy. The proposed approach integrates experimental characterization of manual tactile interactions, pneumatic system modeling, and closed-loop control. Force measurements obtained from a neonatology specialist were used to define clinically grounded stimulation levels, with mean values of 0.594 N for light stimulation and 1.267 N for moderate stimulation. These values were mapped to actuator pressure through experimentally identified linear relationships between force, pressure, and electrical current, enabling the definition of therapeutic pressure references. A 3 × 3 matrix of textile pneumatic actuators was integrated with an electro-pneumatic actuation system, pressure sensing, and current monitoring to implement the proposed therapy platform. Two control strategies were evaluated: a baseline pressure deadband controller and a refined deadband controller incorporating actuation tuning and current-based protection. Experimental results demonstrated that the refined controller increased the time within the therapeutic pressure band from 30.8% to 76.1%, while reducing mean pressure error from 0.68 kPa to 0.15 kPa and RMS error from 0.92 kPa to 0.38 kPa. Robustness tests under varying mechanical interface conditions showed stable and consistent pressure regulation performance. These results demonstrate the feasibility of translating clinically derived tactile stimulation into controlled pneumatic actuation using a soft robotic platform. By combining clinically grounded references, pressure-based closed-loop control, and safety-oriented current monitoring, the proposed system provides a reproducible and safe preclinical platform for neonatal tactile therapy and supports the development of assistive soft robotic technologies for clinically representative neonatal care environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.