ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2026
Rehabilitation assessment of upper limb motor function in stroke patients based on semi-quantitative information.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During stroke rehabilitation, the recovery of upper-limb motor function is a primary therapeutic objective. Accurate rehabilitation assessment is essential for the scientific design and implementation of individualized training programs. However, current clinical practice predominantly relies on scale-based manual evaluations, which depend heavily on clinicians' subjective judgment and may compromise objectivity and accuracy. To overcome this limitation, this study develops a novel horizontal upper-limb rehabilitation robot for quantifying patient movement data and proposes an upper-limb rehabilitation assessment model based on semi-quantitative information. The model integrates quantitative data collected by the robot with expert knowledge, employing a BRB algorithm to dynamically and objectively evaluate patients' rehabilitation status. To validate the accuracy and effectiveness of the proposed method, BP and SVM neural networks are adopted for comparative models. Comparative analysis demonstrates that the semi-quantitative information-based BRB model achieves significantly higher accuracy than the alternative models. This approach not only enables rapid and precise monitoring of patients' rehabilitation progress but also provides a robust foundation for the scientific formulation of individualized rehabilitation training plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.