Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42292022›Full record

ArticleSurgical case reports2026

Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Preservation of a Prior Hepaticojejunostomy for Ampullary Carcinoma: A Case Report.

Yasunori Uesato, Susumu Inamine

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yasunori UesatoDepartment of Metabolic Surgery, Ohama Daiichi Hospital, Naha, Okinawa, Japan.
Susumu InamineDepartment of Metabolic Surgery, Ohama Daiichi Hospital, Naha, Okinawa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) can be technically challenging in patients who previously underwent biliary reconstruction, particularly hepaticojejunostomy. The optimal strategy for managing a prior hepaticojejunostomy during PD has not been well established. CASE PRESENTATION: A woman in her 70s developed ampullary carcinoma 10 years after diversion surgery for pancreaticobiliary maljunction. She had previously undergone laparoscopic extrahepatic bile duct resection with hepaticojejunostomy. Subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy was planned. Intraoperatively, dense adhesions were observed around the hepaticojejunostomy, and the previous bile duct transection had been performed near the hepatic duct bifurcation. Resection of the existing anastomosis was considered technically risky because it might have resulted in multiple small biliary openings and increased operative complexity. Therefore, the hepaticojejunostomy was preserved based on intraoperative findings. Reconstruction was completed using a single jejunal limb for pancreaticojejunostomy and gastrojejunostomy. The operative time was 430 min, and blood loss was 192 mL. The postoperative course was uneventful. Pathological examination revealed well-differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater (pT1aN0M0, Stage IA) with negative margins. The patient remains recurrence-free 6 months after surgery.

conclusionsCareful intraoperative assessment is important when determining whether a prior hepaticojejunostomy should be preserved during PD. Preservation may represent a reasonable option when re-dissection around the hepatic hilum is technically hazardous.

Indexed as

ampullary carcinomahepaticojejunostomypancreaticoduodenectomyreconstructionreoperation

Identifiers

PMID42292022
PMCPMC13254555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.