ArticleCureus2026
Ground-Level Fall vs. Other Mechanisms of Injury in Patients With a Shock Index of Greater Than One at a Rural Level 1 Trauma Center.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ground-level falls (GLFs) often are viewed as minor injuries but can pose significant risks for patients with a shock index (SI) greater than one. This retrospective study is aimed at comparing outcomes of GLF patients with a high SI to those who sustained trauma via other mechanisms who also have a SI>1 to provide insight for improved trauma care. Conducted at Johnson City Medical Center in Johnson City, Tennessee, from September 1, 2021, to January 1, 2024, the study analyzed data from a trauma registry and EpicCare Link (Epic Systems Corporation, Verona, USA), focusing on demographics, injury details, and clinical outcomes. 387 patients met the inclusion criteria. 16.5% (n=64) of patients comprised the GLF population, were older (mean of 65.6 vs 43.6 years, p<0.001), predominantly female (p<0.001), and more likely referred from other facilities (p<0.001). They had lower injury severity scores (ISS) (p=0.002), lower emergency medical service (EMS) shock index scores (p=0.012), and were less likely to need surgery (p=0.007). All patients had an SI>1. Despite these differences, mortality rates were similar to those of other trauma patients, emphasizing the critical nature of GLFs despite their seemingly benign mechanism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.