ArticleCureus2026
Spinal Anesthesia in the Prone Position: A Case Series.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Spinal anesthesia (SA) is a safe and effective strategy for many procedures, providing several advantages over general anesthesia. SA is usually performed in a sitting or lateral position, followed by careful repositioning to achieve the final surgical position. This mobilization process may cause technical difficulties related to the patient, consume valuable time, and lead to an unpredictable spread of the local anesthetic agent. To overcome these challenges, some authors have successfully performed SA with the patient already in the prone position. Methods In this article, we present a case series of 81 patients who underwent pilonidal sinus surgery under SA in the prone position. Results The technique achieved a 100% overall success rate, with 86.4% success on the first attempt. Adequate anesthetic block was obtained in all cases, without hemodynamic instability or respiratory complications during the procedure, and no complications related to the technique or patient positioning were observed. Conclusions SA performed in the prone position appears to be a safe and effective approach for pilonidal sinus surgery, providing high success rates and a low incidence of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.