Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42291943›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Implications for Clinical Practice.

Besan M Khanfar, Rasha Ali

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Besan M KhanfarGeneral Practice, Independent General Practitioner, Tabuk, SAU.
Rasha AliFamily Medicine, Family Medicine Academy, Tabuk Health Cluster, Tabuk, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in primary care is a major global problem, as primary care represents the first point of contact between the patient and a health system, contributing to health system burden and resulting in antimicrobial resistance. The objective of this study is to systematically review evidence on inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in primary care. In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 recommendations, PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for relevant studies that were published in the last five years, and 12 studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included. Inappropriate antibiotic prescription was highly prevalent across various income settings, particularly for respiratory tract infections such as bronchitis. Broad-spectrum antibiotics, especially amoxicillin-clavulanate, were frequently inappropriately prescribed. Factors affecting inappropriate prescribing were a combination of patient, provider, and system-level determinants. Multifaceted strategies should be considered to help improve inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in primary care.

Indexed as

antibiotic prescriptionantimicrobial resistanceantimicrobial stewardshipbroad-spectrum antibioticsinappropriate antibiotic prescribingprescribing behaviorprimary carerespiratory tract infections

Identifiers

PMID42291943
PMCPMC13264486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.