ArticleCureus2026
Recurrent Ameloblastic Fibroma of the Posterior Maxilla With Radiopaque Foci: A Diagnostic Challenge Within the Odontogenic Tumor Spectrum.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ameloblastic fibroma (AF) is classically defined as a benign mixed odontogenic tumor lacking calcified dental tissues and typically presenting as a radiolucent lesion in the posterior mandible of young patients. This case report presents a recurrent AF of the posterior maxilla in a 16‑year‑old girl, characterized by radiopaque foci and a discordance between radiological and histopathological findings. A panoramic radiograph and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) initially suggested an odontoma indirectly interfering with the eruption of tooth 27. Surgical enucleation revealed a radiolucent lesion containing distinct radiopaque structures and multiple gelatinous fragments, all removed and submitted for histopathological analysis. Repeated histopathological evaluations twice confirmed the diagnosis of AF without evidence of organized dental hard tissue or malignancy. Five years later, a routine follow‑up CBCT revealed a similar lesion at the same site, again managed by surgical enucleation and again diagnosed as AF. This case challenges current concepts in the World Health Organization odontogenic tumor classification, particularly the separation of AF from developing odontomas, and underscores the diagnostic complexity created by internal calcifications in lesions histologically lacking dental hard tissue. The findings emphasize the critical importance of extensive histopathological sampling and close clinico‑radiologic-pathologic correlation in atypical or recurrent mixed odontogenic tumors. It is also suggested that AF may occasionally exhibit limited inductive or calcific features, without justifying reclassification within the developing odontoma spectrum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.