ArticleCureus2026
Feasibility of Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of the Facial and Vestibulocochlear Nerves on High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the feasibility of deep learning-based automated segmentation of the facial and vestibulocochlear nerves within the cisternal and intracanalicular segments on high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. STUDY DESIGN AND
settingThis was a retrospective imaging study conducted at a tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Twenty-two adult patients with normal internal auditory canal magnetic resonance imaging and no skull base pathology were included.
methodsManual segmentation of the facial and vestibulocochlear nerves was performed on axial constructive interference in steady state magnetic resonance images using 3D Slicer. The dataset was divided into training, validation, and test subsets. A three-dimensional U-Net convolutional neural network was trained with standard augmentation. Additional Medical Open Network for Artificial Intelligence-based architectures, including Attention U-Net, Dynamic U-Net, and U-Net++, were trained and compared under identical preprocessing and training conditions.
resultsAll models generated anatomically plausible segmentations on qualitative review. The baseline U-Net achieved a test Dice similarity coefficient of 0.6398. Dynamic U-Net demonstrated the highest validation performance (Dice = 0.6236), while U-Net++ achieved the highest test performance (Dice = 0.6716). Attention U-Net demonstrated lower performance in this small-structure segmentation task. Performance trends were consistent with the challenges inherent to segmenting thin neural structures with limited voxel representation.
conclusionsDeep learning-based segmentation of the facial and vestibulocochlear nerves on high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging is feasible within a limited retrospective dataset. Model selection appears important for small-structure segmentation, with Dynamic U-Net and U-Net++ demonstrating relatively higher performance trends within this limited dataset. Although performance metrics were modest and derived from a limited test dataset, automated segmentation showed consistent anatomic overlap with manual labels on qualitative review. These findings provide preliminary technical groundwork for future validation in larger cohorts and extension to clinically relevant applications such as cochlear nerve integrity in implant candidates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.