Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42291842›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2026

Development and validation of a miRNA-based prognostic model for high-grade serous ovarian cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Cristiane Esteves Teixeira, Nayara Gusmão Tessarollo, Glenerson Baptista, Alessandra Freitas Serain, Helena Zancanaro, Diego José Gomes de Paula, Luciana Castro Moreeuw, Cláudia Bessa Pereira Chaves, João P B Viola, Alexandre Dias Porto Chiavegatto Filho and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Cristiane Esteves TeixeiraLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Division of Experimental and Translational Research, Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Nayara Gusmão TessarolloLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Division of Experimental and Translational Research, Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Glenerson BaptistaLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Division of Experimental and Translational Research, Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Alessandra Freitas SerainLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Division of Experimental and Translational Research, Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Helena ZancanaroLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Division of Experimental and Translational Research, Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Diego José Gomes de PaulaNational Tumor Bank, Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Luciana Castro MoreeuwNational Tumor Bank, Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Cláudia Bessa Pereira ChavesGynecologic Oncology Department and Division of Clinical Research, Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
João P B ViolaProgram of Immunology and Tumor Biology, Division of Experimental and Translational Research, Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Alexandre Dias Porto Chiavegatto FilhoDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Mariana BoroniLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Division of Experimental and Translational Research, Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ovarian cancer, particularly high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), is the most lethal gynecological malignancy, mainly due to late-stage diagnosis and limited prognostic biomarkers. Current clinical markers, such as CA125, have limited prognostic accuracy for risk stratification. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have emerged as promising biomarkers due to roles in tumor biology and stability in biofluids. This study aimed to identify and validate prognostic miRNA biomarkers in HGSOC. Methods: A machine learning pipeline was implemented to develop a prognostic model using miRNA data. Candidate miRNAs were identified through feature selection and differential expression analyses. Recursive Feature Elimination determined the optimal predictor set among miRNAs combined with age, stage, and Findings: The final model, incorporating 9 miRNAs with clinical variables, achieved an AUC of 0.762 [95% CI: 0.621-0.903], exceeding previously reported signatures. Key miRNAs, including hsa-miR-205-5p and hsa-miR-150-5p, were associated with angiogenesis, invasion, and chemoresistance pathways. In RT-qPCR validation, discriminative performance decreased; however, the continuous risk score remained independently associated with survival, achieving a C-index of 0.85 in multivariable analysis. Interpretation: We present an interpretable miRNA-based prognostic model for HGSOC integrating molecular features. Although ROC-based discrimination was limited in external validation, survival analyses supported independent prognostic value, with the continuous risk score significantly associated with survival. Continuous and classification-based stratification identified survival groups, supporting clinical relevance of the model and identified miRNA signature. Funding: CNPq; FAPERJ; Brazilian Ministry of Health (INCA/MS).

Indexed as

Explainable AIHigh-grade serous ovarian cancerMachine learning in oncologymiRNA-based prognostic modelPrognostic biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID42291842
PMCPMC13264362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.