ArticleFrontiers in aging2026
Underuse of osteoporosis treatments before and after hip fracture: longitudinal findings from the Gruppo Italiano di Ortogeriatria (GIOG 2.0) study.
Article in Frontiers in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Osteoporosis is a major cause of fragility fractures, with hip fracture (HF) representing the most severe complication in older adults. However, national data on osteoporosis treatment use before and after hip fracture in Italy are limited. Methods: This multicenter prospective study included individuals aged ≥65 years admitted for HF between July 2019 and June 2024 at 12 orthogeriatric centers. Osteoporosis treatments (vitamin D, calcium, antiresorptive, anabolic, dual effect agents) were recorded at admission, discharge, and 120- and 365-day follow-ups. Patients were classified as "Never users" if untreated throughout the study period or "Ever users" if treated at least once. Multivariate logistic regression identified factors independently associated with lack of treatment. Results: Among 1,012 patients (median age 83 years; 77.2% female), 85.6% were untreated at admission; this proportion dropped to 34.4% at discharge but rose again to 50% at 1 year. Vitamin D and calcium were the predominant treatments, while antiresorptive, anabolic, and dual effect agents were underused. Overall, 22% of patients were classified as "Never users". They were generally older, more often male, and had higher comorbidity, dementia, frailty, and mobility limitations. Only male sex was independently associated with lack of treatment (Odds Ratio 2.37, 95% Confidence Intervals 1.59-3.55). Conclusion: Despite clinical guideline recommendations, osteoporosis treatment remains suboptimal among older HF patients in Italy, especially in male patients. Findings support the need for national programs and multidisciplinary strategies to reduce the treatment gap and improve long-term management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.