Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42291729›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026

Self-distillation double student network for semi-supervised medical image segmentation.

Huaxiang Liu, Xin Li, Jie Jin, Shiqing Zhang, Youyao Fu, Jiangxiong Fang, Guoyu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Huaxiang LiuTaizhou University Affiliated Taizhou Central Hospital, Taizhou University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xin LiTaizhou University Affiliated Taizhou Central Hospital, Taizhou University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jie JinTaizhou University Affiliated Taizhou Central Hospital, Taizhou University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
Shiqing ZhangTaizhou University Affiliated Taizhou Central Hospital, Taizhou University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
Youyao FuArtificial Intelligence School, Taizhou University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jiangxiong FangTaizhou University Affiliated Taizhou Central Hospital, Taizhou University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
Guoyu WangTaizhou University Affiliated Taizhou Central Hospital, Taizhou University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Semi-supervised learning (SSL) has garnered considerable attention in medical image segmentation due to its ability to leverage abundant unlabeled data, thereby significantly alleviating the dependency on expensive pixel-wise annotations. However, existing Mean-Teacher-based frameworks typically guide the student network using a teacher model in a unidirectional or loosely interactive manner, which fails to fully exploit the complementary relationships between different networks and often struggles with low-confidence predictions that degrade boundary accuracy. To address these limitations, we propose SDBS-Net, a novel semi-supervised dual-student self-distillation network for 3D medical image segmentation. The architecture comprises a shared encoder and two parallel decoders, forming two networks (Model I and Model II) that process both labeled and unlabeled volumes simultaneously. To enable effective bidirectional knowledge transfer, we introduce two synergistic training schemas: a prior knowledge learning (PKL) schema with hierarchical difference (HD) modules and a Self-Distillation Learning (SDL) schema. The PKL schema extracts and inject multi-scale discrepancy features from Model I into Model II, enhancing discriminative representation and boundary delineation, while the SDL schema employs multi-level soft-label and feature distillation losses to correct confirmation bias and refine overlooked regions in a mutually reinforcing manner. Extensive experiments on two challenging benchmarks such as the Left Atrium (LA) dataset and the Pancreas-CT dataset demonstrate the superiority of SDBS-Net. With only 10% and 20% labeled data, our method achieves Dice scores of 88.19% and 90.51% on the LA dataset, and 71.39% and 79.37% on the Pancreas-CT dataset, respectively, consistently outperforming state-of-the-art semi-supervised approaches while approaching fully supervised performance.

Indexed as

dual-student frameworkhierarchical feature differencemedical image segmentationself-distillationsemi-supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID42291729
PMCPMC13259825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.